Managerial power is under siege as clubs prioritize directors and instant results. Recent high-profile sackings suggest higher volatility in manager markets — punters could find value on managerial-change props and short-term sack odds, while backing long-term projects (Arteta/ Klopp-style) in futures markets may be a safer play.
Is the Manager Era Imploding? The Rise of the Executive Over the Dugout
"Sam Longson's shot across the bows of Brian Clough" still resonates: the chairman, the board and executives increasingly call the shots. A string of 2026 firings has exposed how precarious the manager’s role has become. Modern ownership structures, aggressive recruitment departments and a demand for instant results are chipping away at the idea that the head coach is the singular heartbeat of a club.
Why managers are so vulnerable
Coaches face pressure from multiple directions: owners chasing short-term gains, analytics teams flagging fitness or tactical shortcomings, and noisy fanbases demanding silverware yesterday. When success is measured quarterly rather than strategically, the simplest remedy for underperformance is a change in the dugout — and owners know it.
Case study: Xabi Alonso and the Madrid experiment
Xabi Alonso returned to Real Madrid with elite coaching credentials and early signs of tactical brilliance. His possession-first approach translated initially into excellent results and a revitalized Kylian Mbappé. But internal frictions — notably with Vinícius Júnior — and a tactical compromise to placate criticism saw the team’s form and expected-goal profile dip. The episode highlights how even successful, high-profile coaches can be forced into reactive decisions that undermine their long-term vision.
Other flashpoints: Amorim, Maresca and the Old Trafford fallout
Ruben Amorim’s insistence on a singular tactical approach and public friction with club hierarchy exemplifies another route to dismissal: clash culture. Enzo Maresca’s reported difficulties with recruitment and medical departments underline a broader trend — coaches often battle internal structures that curtail their selection and training autonomy. Statements from successors stressing "you must win" reveal how job security is now explicitly transactional.
Long-term projects vs. Instant Success: The Arsenal and Klopp examples
Mikel Arteta’s tenure at Arsenal demonstrates the alternative: patience, investment and alignment between front office and coach. When backing is sustained — recruitment, retention and tactical time — clubs can reap transformational rewards. Jurgen Klopp’s Liverpool era and other coach-club symbioses show the upside when the manager retains real authority and a coherent long-term plan is pursued.
How ownership models drive change
International and particularly American investors often see traditional managerial power as inefficient. They prefer structures where sporting directors, analytics teams and medical departments manage longer-term player strategy, leaving coaches to focus on immediate match outputs. That separation can reduce managerial autonomy but is argued to create clearer accountability for results.
What this means for betting markets
The increasing frequency of managerial changes feeds specific betting markets. Expect growth in: - Managerial-change prop markets (short-term odds on sackings/appointments). - Early-season “will manager last the season?” markets offering value when clubs show impatience. - Futures markets where backing clubs with proven long-term coaches can be a hedge against volatility.
Punters should monitor club ownership type, recent boardroom activity, and signals of alignment (or lack of it) between recruitment and coaching staff. Clubs with patient ownership and documented support for coaches often outperform expectation in longer-term markets; clubs undergoing executive restructuring or those with public coach-board tensions are likelier to offer value on managerial-change bets.
Conclusion: The dugout remains central — but different
The manager is no longer universally the untouchable maestro of modern clubs, but neither is the role obsolete. The face in the dugout still shapes matchday narratives and team identity, yet increasingly within a framework set by executives. For clubs that get the balance right — empowering the coach while providing strategic, long-term backing — the rewards remain substantial. For bettors, that balance is a key signal for short-term prop markets and longer-term futures.
Frenkie de Jong slammed for Kylian Mbappe horror tackle as El Clasico descends into chaos
As modern owners grasp for more power is the era of managers coming to an end?
Cbssports
